Critical thinking or educated cognition in the teaching and practice of medicine

Authors

  • Eva Peguero Rodríguez Médico Familia. EAP El Castell, ICS. Profesora Departamento Ciencias Clínicas Facultad Medicina Universidad de Barcelona. Grupo Comunicación y Salud de España. semFYC. GEHUCT.
  • Francesc Borrell i Carrió Médico de Familia. Grupo Comunicación y Salud de España. semFYC. GEHUCT.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30860/0098

Keywords:

Critical thinking, Scientific model, COVID-19

Abstract

This article explains and exemplifies the definition of critical thinking in medicine and its relationship with the scientific model.

Critical thinking, or better yet, educated cognition, consists of knowing how to identify and evidence-based knowledge of another that is not, in knowing how to manage uncertainty in situations such as the still current COVID-19 pandemic. It consists of seeking truthfulness as a method. And it requires a capacity for criticism with a dose of skepticism.

The second part of the article argues the importance of having knowledge based on models. Knowledge not beliefs. The scientific model consists of framing scientific knowledge in an explanatory model that is not a magic model or a justifying model. The scientific model recognizes its strengths and weaknesses, that is, it is applied critically, and is obliged to explain and predict parts of physical, psychic, or social reality.

In general, critical thinking is associated with a way to reach the truth, but, as we describe in this article, it is much more appropriate to consider it a way to rectify and perfect our motor and reflection habits, and a methodology to think according to models that explain reality as well as possible and to rectify with little moral pain.

References

Stolberg M. Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835. J R Soc Med. 2006 Dec;99(12):642-3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.12.642. PMID: 17139070; PMCID: PMC1676327. Disponible en: http://jameslindlibrary.org/wp-data/uploads/2016/08/J-R-Soc-Med-2006-12-Stolberg-642-3.pdf

Stub T, Musial F, Kristoffersen AA, Alræk T, Liu J. Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Jun;26:146-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 26. PMID: 27261996.

Mathie RT, Ulbrich-Zürni S, Viksveen P, Roberts ER, Baitson ES, Legg LA, Davidson JRT. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Otherthan-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Individualised Homeopathic Treatment. Homeopathy. 2018 Nov;107(4):229-243. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667129. Epub 2018 Aug 18. PMID: 30121049.

Fisher P. Homeopathy and The Lancet. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2006;3(1):145-147. doi:10.1093/ecam/nek007

VV.AA El Economista. Ranking de empresas. Volumen de ventas de Boiron Sociedad Ibérica De Homeopatía SA en España de 2015 a 2018. Disponible en: https://ranking-empresas.eleconomista.es/BOIRON-IBERICAHOMEOPATIA.html

VV.AA “Médicos por la verdad” Diario de Sevilla 02 Abril 2021 Accesible en: https://www.diariodesevilla.es/sociedad/Medicos-Verdad-peligrosanegacionista-expande_0_1561045139.html

Web Fundación para el Pensamiento Crítico, (Critical Thinking Foundation). Disponible en: https://www.criticalthinking.org/

Payeras B. Revelador estudio del biólogo Bartomeu Payeras sobre la relación entre pandemia y tecnología 5-G. Youtube. Disponible en:

https://www.cambio16.com/biologo-espanol-vincula-equipos-5g-con-lapotenciacion-de-la-covid19/

Borrell i Carrió F. Covid19, una oportunidad para reflexionar sobre la toma de decisiones en incertidumbre. Folia Humanística 2020;3(2):1-46. Doi: http://doi.org/10.30860/0068. Disponible en: https://revista.proeditio.com/foliahumanistica/article/view/2562/3178

Ramón y Cajal S. El hombre natural y el hombre artificial. Barcelona: Planeta Agostini; 2010.

Montaigne. Essais. Lubine: Livrefrance; 2010. Disponible en: https://livrefrance.com/Montaigne.pdf

Published

2023-09-21

How to Cite

Peguero Rodríguez, E., & Borrell i Carrió, F. (2023). Critical thinking or educated cognition in the teaching and practice of medicine. Prueba, 3(2), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.30860/0098

Issue

Section

Pensamiento actual