Procedural effects caused by the nullity of urban plannning on the agreements derived from it. (Commentary on the Supreme Court Ruling (1511/2022, of November 30, 2002, of the 5th Section of the 3rd Chamber of the Supreme Court. Rec. 7929/2021)

Abstract

The cascading nullity of the Planning, as a rule, is communicated to the
acts dictated under its protection, without prejudice to the conservation of
those that are firm. Urban Agreements, being agreements of a contractual
nature, when they are signed and approved in execution of a null Plan, are
null and void due to lack of cause or porpose and they did not respond to an
authentic consent. If a Court that must resolve the discussion between the
parties on the application or content of an urban Agreement, is aware by itself
or by one of the parties that the Plan that was the cause of the Agreement
is null, it must understand that the object of the appeal has perished.
and recognize it in the resolution that puts an end to the process.