The Irruption of Artificial Intelligence in Civil Proceedings: Challenges and Opportunities
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Justice; Administration of Justice; civil procedure; evidence.Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence by the judiciary can be
fundamentally grouped into two categories: its use in procedural
processing, and that arising from the advent of Artificial
Intelligence in civil proceedings, understood as the fundamental
instrument for the material demonstration of facts as they
occurred or their formal establishment for dispute resolution. As
highlighted by the AI Regulation, the use of Artificial Intelligence
within the judiciary, particularly that used to assist the judicial
or competent authority in alternative dispute resolution, as well
as those acting on its behalf in investigating and interpreting
facts and/or the law, and in their application to specific facts, is a
“somewhat risky” use, where the significance of the implications
of Artificial Intelligence can have greater repercussions and
where the obligations to be fulfilled by those using it are of
greater depth (both formal and material). However, despite
the difficulties it entails, it is evident that Artificial Intelligence is
here to stay, also within the Judiciary and in the daily routine of
the various legal operators. This reality obliges all of us who are
part of this “dance” to question the risks it entails, the reaction
and difficulties that arise when this technology clashes with
our current legislation, and to find solutions that facilitate the
legitimate and peaceful coexistence of judicial activity with this
new tool.
Downloads
References
CASAL TAVASCI, Javier. Inteligencia Artificial y administración de justicia. https://protecciondata.es/inteligencia-artificialadministracion-
justicia/
CATALÁN CHAMORRO, María José. La Justicia Digital en España. Retos y Desafíos. Tirant lo Blanch, Octubre de 2023.
DE LA OLIVA SANTOS, A. (2016). Curso de Derecho procesal civil II. Parte especial. Madrid: Universitaria Ramón Areces, pág. 115
DÖRING, E. La prueba. Valletta Ediciones, 2003.
FERNÁNDEZ RODRÍGUEZ, José Julio. La siguiente del ordenamiento jurídico español en la jurisprudencia constitucional.
GASCON INCHAUSTI, F. (2022 – 2023) Derecho procesal civil. Materiales para el estudio de la Universidad Complutense
de Madrid. Madrid. Edición digital I.S.B.N.: 978-84-09-14500-3. Pág. 71.
GONZALO QUIROGA, M. La inteligencia artificial en el arbitraje internacional 2.0. Oportunidades y desafíos en un futuro
que ya es presente. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional. Octubre 2023, Vol. 15, Núm. 2, pp. 516 – 550.
LORENZO PEREZ, Cristina. Inteligencia artificial en la administración de justicia: regulación española y marco
europeo e internacional. Proyectos desarrollados por el ministerio de justicia de España. Dirección General de
Transformación Digital de la Administración de Justicia. Marzo 2022.
ROSADO IGLESIAS, Gema. Seguridad jurídica y valor vinculante de la jurisprudencia.
SCHIELE MANZOR, Carolina. La jurisprudencia como fuente del derecho: el papel de la jurisprudencia.
SIMÓN CASTELLANO, Pere. Inteligencia Artificial y Administración de Justicia: ¿Quo vadis, justitia?. Revista de internet, derecho
y política, abril de 2021.
TÜRING, A. Maquinaria computacional e inteligencia. Mind, 1950.
JURISPRUDENCIA
Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 2023 WL 4114965, at *3, *9 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2023)
Park v. Kim, 2024 WL 332478 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2024)
Parker v Forsyth N.O. and Others (1585/20) [2023] ZAGPRD 1 (29 June 2023)
People v. Crabill, 2023 WL 8111898, at *1 (Colo. O.P.D.J. Nov. 22,2023)
OTROS
Encuentro “Robotización e Inteligencia Artificial en la Justicia”, organizado por el Ministerio de Justicia en colaboración
con AMETIC el pasado 16 de Marzo de 2022. https://youtu.be/0S8kfKm8GZI
https://vlex.es/vid/principios-dispositivo-aportacion-parte-201995
https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/serviciosdeprensa/notasprensa/
justicia/Paginas/2023/140923-inteligencia-artificial-servicios. aspx
Texto del Reglamento e 2 de febrero de 2024, aprobado el pasado 13 de febrero. Provisional agreement resulting
from interinstitutional negotiations regarding the proposal for a regulation laying down harmonized rules on Artificial
Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts 2021/0106

